If the Glove Doesn’t Fit…

…then you must … um … quit?

Sorry! I’ve never been really good with catch-phrases, “hooks” or jingles. Probably why my career on Madison Avenue never quite panned out. I’ll be OK; nary a moment passes where I find myself wondering if “sometimes I’d feel more fulfilled making Christmas Cards with the mentally ill.” {*1} So, gather round kids cause today’s letter is “C” as in CooCKie, CoKo Channel, CoKa Cola, CanCKer or rooster.

Today’s “C” word: Condoms! Yeah, that’s it. {*2} Never liked ’em. Never will. If this ruins our chances for “love,” I won’t be losing a single moment of sleep over it. As I’ve previously expressed, I have not always been fully aware of the way our world operates (not that I claim to now), but even back in my younger days, I thought this “condom mania” (like Beatlemania or any other “mania”) was suspicious at best. As I dared say amongst close company in those days:

“You know. This stupid condom thing. It just feels wrong. I have this weird image of a bunch of greedy old men sitting around a table in some smoky room going “We tax them when they eat. We tax them when they drink. We tax every single leisure activity these peasants engage in, except for one, coitus!” And then, scheming of a way to invade one of the last true wonderful bastions of free-expression and free leisure [not to mention, a damn good one at that, probably topping ALL the ones you have to pay for]. And then, doing it!”

Having now spent time further researching the topic, I was surprised to learn that I really wasn’t that far off back then. I don’t know whether some old men actually sat at in some smoky room around some table speaking those words verbatim, but my intuition was dead on. [I could also deduce there would be no “official minutes” of such a meeting. I didn’t say a bunch of dumb and anal old men.] If there was any flaw in my original line of thinking, it was underestimating the lengths they would go to, or fathom the extent of their depravity and greed.

My findings soon, but first, let’s look at the tactics/strategies used to sell us the idea of condoms. Mmm, a little [androgynous] ass may put you “in the mood.” But, what’s that? HIV Positive! Eek! Mood killer. Why do I suddenly feel like going out and buying a new sweater? OMG! Is not wearing a condom like fighting an oil fire without a protection suit? Don’t be stupid! Only a fool wouldn’t wear condoms! {*3}

Remember kids, “safety first.” Check this out (below). What an amazing little poster. Shows me all the things a boy and a girl could do together for fun. Or, a girl and girl. Or, a boy and a boy. Is bisexuality an agenda too? Well, think of the marketing of homosexuality as kindler gentler form of population control. That’s all I have to say about that. Oh, and whatever object that girl is getting ready to stick up that guy’s ass on the bottom right. Honey, don’t even think about it!

Yea. The campaign to scare us into using condoms came from all ends of the ad industry, and of course, like all good wolves, came to us disguised in the best of sheep’s clothing; that of “concern for our well being.” Just like we saw on 9/11, first you traumatize, then you give them a simple childish explanation/solution. Trauma, has been psychologically proven to reduce people to a child-like state. So, here are a few condom salesmen/mascots to help those people out:

Um, who exactly is the target audience for these? Ah, kids! So, why are you marketing sex to our children? No, we’re not marketing sex to your children. We just want to protect them. You children could end up pregnant, and might have to drop out of the indoctrination centers, we mean schools. Or, worse, get AIDS and die! Oh, OK. Thanks, good to know someone’s looking out for our children, cause we’re utterly incapable of parenting ourselves.

So, they need sex education. Um, shouldn’t the parents be responsible for that? No. Because some parents won’t do it. So, we have to educate kids at school. And, we’re going to show them how to put condoms on bananas. Even after they get used to bananas, those slower children may still not get it, so we may go ahead and budget for these new training aids that feature more lifelike appendages for your kids to practice with. Um, thanks???

Uh, not OK! Sex education involves explaining the facts of life to your kids, not practicing alongside them. You can explain masturbation or intercourse to a child without demonstrating. As any half-decent parent knows, dwelling on a topic, or repetition just leads to more curiosity. This isn’t education. This is marketing!

You can thank Disney Corporation (and maybe even the good folks at Tavistock) for learning early on: the sooner you get a customer hooked, the longer you keep them. Children’s minds are the ones most ripe for manipulation. Many companies have since followed suit (e.g., the Tobacco industry, the Fashion industry). But, seeing the average mind has been dumbed-down by the school system (and over-exposure to television), be sure to come up with a few easily memorable catch-phrases (ones that even idiots may remember): {*4}

Your up-front work done on the early mind (i.e., customer), now you just sit back and watch the profits roll in. Has anyone looked at the kind of money in the condom business? First, think about the billions of people on this planet. Next, consider how many of those people are having sex at this exact moment. Then, think about the percentage of them using condoms. Think about the profit involved in raising that number by just 1%. Looking at just a few articles should offer some insight:

• New Strategy for Condoms
• Hindustan Latex posts record profit
• Church & Dwight profits rise on condoms
• MARKET PLACE; Condom Stock Gain Continues
• Condom Maker Can Offer Upside in Down Markets
• Female Health Company Reports Record Profits

Do your own research if you wish. Google “condoms, profits, etc” and you’ll find a lot more articles. Back to strategy, don’t forget to market to brainwash them as they turn into teens and prepare to go to college. Tell them what common sense is, instead of letting them develop it. Hand out free condoms wherever sexually active youths tend to congregate. Appeal to princess programming in women (e.g., the below cross-marketing ad drawing from both De Beers and Disney themes):

Speaking of the NYC image, doesn’t it strike you as odd that free condoms are available to anyone at anytime in a city of that size? But you should know, nothing is free. Some fools somewhere are paying for the program. Most likely, you.

So, we’ve laid the groundwork. Now, watch them grow into ideal customers (i.e., robots). Feed them a steady diet of occasional reminders via their growth path (Disney to Nickelodeon to MTV). The schools will keep them busy memorizing instead of learning how to think (and suppress their creativity). And then, they’ll just emulate, emulate, emulate:

Did any of these people stop and ask, “What exactly is this that I’m putting in my mouth? What kind of toxic chemicals were used to make this? Who makes this?” Oh, never mind. Mimic and repeat. Mimic and repeat. Monkey see. Monkey do.

I know they’ve managed to suppress our intelligence. I know they’ve convinced us to no longer trust our intuition. But, have they also managed to make us overcome the natural aversion we have to foul chemical smells? Obviously, at one time, we, like all the other animals on this planet, had the ability to smell foods and decide what was safe for us to consume.

All one really has to do is just “smell” a condom. What a foul odor! And, it lingers on your hands and every part of your body it comes into contact with. Perhaps the suggestion’s been synchromystically put to us before our subconscious already (Spinal Tap fans will inevitably recognize the first “controversial” image):

Seriously, just take one smell of the “glove.” But, never mind. Don’t listen to your natural instincts. Look! Lollipop condoms! Don’t you wanna put one in your mouth? Aren’t they cute? And who is the target market for lollipops? Little girls. Why? Cause they’re phallic. It’s subliminal training. Do you honestly think it’s only coincidental? A minor hint from Webster’s code book: fellatio [¡see FEMININE!).

I recall some girl I encountered a few years ago who told me she wouldn’t fellate me unless I wore a condom. Once I managed to stop laughing … I asked her when she developed a taste for chemical stew? This insanity has gone to the extent of having spawned a new form of Bukkake. Yes, “condom Bukkake.”

Why would I stoop to this level you may ask? That’s a fair question. Why would I bring up something as debasing as Bukakke. Well, I could make a synchromystic reach and say the above right image, while funny on the surface, may imply losing our 3rd eye (the one likely so calcified by fluoride now, it’s almost blind). The continued degeneration that something like Bukkake has not just on the recipient, or the participants, but the audience, and eventually, the human soul.

Were it something confined to a small section of perverts, well fine. Let them be. But, when a major media conglomerate indoctrinates children into the act, that’s beyond infuriating. I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw this image in Disassociation through Disney’s Enchantment [do read the article]. {*5} Be advised: click comparison image at own risk (while it may be “Rated R,” it is still explicit).

So, Disney is subliminally telling children that Bukkakish facials, while unpleasant, are somehow “magical?” Truly truly disturbing. I’m sure some will ask how Disney rationalized / played-off this scene for the dumbed-down masses? Well, watch the scene for yourself: the lady doth protest while gobs of the sticky white substance pepper her, but squeals and moans in a manner consistent with ecstatic “pleasure.”

As Pseudo-Occult Media exemplifies during his investigation (regarding how fantasy themes are used for the purpose of dissociative “sexual programming” of children):

“Princess Giselle, this sticky liquid will transport you to Andalasia, do you remember Andalasia, Gisele? This magical liquid will take you there.”

“Sticky liquid?” Shudder! A few years ago, There’s Something About Mary, {*6} told legions of young women that you could be desirable, get any man you want and be fabulous with some semen in your hair. But, that wasn’t a “children’s movie!”

Wait a minute. Semen dies shortly after it leaves its “source.” Dead semen. Dead sea-men for Pyaray’s/Cthulhu’s fleet of the undead? Perhaps my last journey to Cthulhu’s realm unduly impacted me??? But then, my head almost did a Linda Blair when I saw the following image:

But, before I get dragged back into Cthulhu’s realm, let me get back some solid facts about condoms that you won’t see advertised or preached to you by mindless do-gooder sex educators or ANYONE in the mainstream media:

1. The HIV/AIDS virus is too small and the perforation of condoms (latex, “natural” or synthetic compounds) too large. It is literally like a ping-pong ball passing through a basketball hoop.
2. Herpes, is not limited to the upper shaft of the penis or the inside of the vagina. A condom, which may help stop skin to skin contact, in no way assures you that you won’t get herpes. And, the virus may be the size of a tennis-ball when plugged into the above analogy.
3. Per this article on condom effectiveness: condoms offer little protection against HPV (neither does the vaccine), not much more against syphilis or chlamydia, and may not really even be all that effective against pregnancy.

Well, that addresses the two biggest fear-based reasons why most people choose to wear condoms (and, arguably, any reason). Coincidentally, the top two both have roots as bio-engineered diseases, sharing many a similarity (my studies lead me to believe that herpes may have at one time been designed as a carrier for the former). Another outcome from that smoky room? Read Len Horowitz’s Emerging Viruses: AIDS And Ebola (Nature, Accident or Intentional)? Then, you decide.

But, why rely on deductive reasoning and common sense? The guys in the smoky room can easily contradict any real scientific discoveries, by literally producing tons of contradictory findings from their own paid “scientists” (i.e., prostitutes with initials preceding or following their names). They have almost unlimited funding (thanks to you giving it to them). They can take another big chunk of that money and go after [what’s left of] your common sense (through marketing):

Aww, cute mascots that care about us handing out free condoms on the beach (where a significant number of attendees are already thinking about sex). Free condoms “anywhere.” The old guys can even save money on marketing by relying on the mimicry of unpaid stooges (center). Don’t forget to market to all races: “Don’t be shame. Be game!”

Convince young driven youths to spend their energy on your campaign cause instead of something that actually helps humanity (e.g., like feeding the homeless in their own city, a population due to arise exponentially in America), and then use them as your unpaid marketing staff. [Maybe they’ll even use MySpace to reach further into the public mind?] And, of course, market in all languages in all parts of the world.

The following image is from a French pro[?]condom ad, found on Synchrapacolypse’s SynchroPhallicism: OctoCock article. It synchs well with this blog, and a little too well with the tentacle them from the last one. Can’t seem to escape Lord Pyaray! Check out the oddly erotic and overtly suggestive “jerk it“/rooster video:

Tracing this tentacle back to the source, we get to the brain center of the entire operation, and this is where you have to, at a minimal, respect the sheer genius of these “people.” [¿have to wonder?] They’ve obviously mastered human psychology. A critical component of the entire operation of selling us the “fear” of these diseases, and prevent us from looking for their true causes, or linking the operation(s), is “programmed” guilt. If you can make the victim feel like it was their own fault they were victimized, then you [the criminal] are in the clear.

Enter the Sexual Revolution! Again, you may despise the guys in the smoky room, but have to admire the genius and long-term strategic planning. Push H.G. Well’s ideas of free love on the hippies who think they’re actually rebelling and working on peace (wrong on both counts). Break down the family through the Women’s Liberation movement; take mom out and control the development of the children via your “schools” and television “programming.” Push the ideas on the young and old, through appropriate “safe” (Disney) or controversial (Playboy) channels. {*7}

That all accomplished, now unleash your bio-engineered plagues on mankind. Go after fringe groups first. Give out free hepatitis vaccines only to homosexuals in target cities. Your media: “Look, the homosexuals are getting AIDS cause they’re having too much sex!” Next, racial targeting. Inject African kids with AIDS through your Polio vaccination program (cause we care so much about those poor starving African kids, never mind feeding them). Have your press write up articles about strange sex practices among Africans, and how black people “don’t wear condoms” and practice “unsafe sex” to explain away why the Negro race is 800% to 1300% more likely to get AIDS.

Note: As previously noted, I don’t have the time or space here to back up all of the above or below statements. While they are debatable, they are also verifiable by even a minimal amount of research.

The set-up is complete. Now just spread fear-mongering among your controlled outlets, label AIDS a “sexually transmitted disease” (which it is not, it is one of “close contact”), and start talking about white girls getting AIDS through heterosexual contact and you’re done. Boo! The rest just takes care of itself.

Scared again? Good! Maybe we can push some of our other agendas on you. Like selling you our police state. Terrorists are out to get you! We need to fund more storm-troopers, with carte blanche to invade your home whenever it suits them (and shoot you with minimal repercussions). Yea, I know we once taught you that bad guys wore black. But, you’re so scared and stupid now, you’ll buy anything!

However, you’re still human. You still wanna get laid, don’t you? [Fair assumption, seeing that sex is used to sell us just about every product imaginable, and our kids are being sexualized at a very early age as well.] Please note: I have not once used the word abstain! {*8}

Look! Safe sex is hot sex! Maybe we can use some celebrity who makes girls wet to be our spokesman? Let’s not forget to rely on the cheap route of repetition by programmed minds. Um, DO stop and take a closer look at the center image, I could not have composed it any better myself:

This was not taken by a professional photographer, so purely through the collective unconscious, we get a treasure trove of synchromystic themes: Get … um, laid? “Deal with it!” A Britney poster! A butterfly (symbolic of mind control) and an alter (strategically behind one of the girl’s heads). Two open flowers in the background (and two “flowers” ready to be opened in the foreground). Pst! Brain gasket blown.

The girl in the snow white image (are those braces?) looks extremely young. And, I really wasn’t planning on going there (you know, there), but that same image (do zoom) does take on an extremely, should we say “anal” undertone. Most people don’t associate Disney with “rim jobs,” but those who’ve been following my blog [¿Hannahl Montanal?] shouldn’t be too surprised. Take a good look at the following image [also] from Disney’s Enchanted, notice the placement of her tongue?

Yes, her tongue is on the rim of the wormhole / manhole. I know, I know. The Disney being innocent and wholesome propaganda runs deep in your own psyche (despite voluminous evidence to the contrary). In the movie, the princess enters a wormhole/stargate and comes out of a manhole (per PoM, picture is her looking up towards the manhole). I had already discussed the synchromystic connection to our own digestive system as a microcausmic wormhole of sorts. May need to revisit.

I really didn’t think I’d have to go so far [much less want to], but many whom I previously tried to suggest Disney’s metaphor to, stubbornly insisted that I “may be reaching on this one.” So, my apologies, but I am now compelled to demonstrate for you, as I did for them, in order to get that “Holy F’n Shit” reaction. Here you go: [in no particular order] a wormhole, a stargate, a manhole, the “Seat of the Cult of the Sun God” (i.e., an anus), and an infamous bar on Halstead:

Looking back at the “Safety First” image, I have to contemplate why in a showcase that seems to depict just about every activity two people could engage in, two pairings are blatantly missing. Do Lesbians not travel around the world? [Yet one pairing, the female inserting object into female’s rear end, is the only one shown twice?] I could go so far as to [ahem] assume they didn’t include the female on male face to rear coupling cause Disney Corp has now trademarked™ it. ;-)

But, enough of that. Let’s get back to cuter and safer subjects. The first of which, was likely never test-marketed on adults (below), while the latter, well … it’s kind of cute and vulgar at the same time. However, in an upcoming blog, I will be taking a closer look on the origins of that HEART symbol, so some may change their mind as to “cute.” Yes, the brain-washing runs very deep.

Those who’ve used condoms have indubitably run into the “with Nonoxynol-9” label. Yes, it is advertised as a “spermicide,” but how many users have ever bothered to look up/research the substance? Well, IF anyone does, they’ll find out that even the WHO (another group with ties to eugenics) had to admit that Nonoxynol-9 increases the risk of HIV transmission. Yes, you read that correctly. Increases.

So, how stupid do they think the general public is and how non-critical do they judge that public mind? Note how the summary contradicts the entire article:

“Condoms should not include N-9 for any use. However, if the only condom available has N-9, it is better than no condom.“

You hear that? That is the sound of the nebulous them laughing at you. We already know, without doubt, that the condom does not, in any way, act as a barrier to HIV transmission. Yet, the WHO’s recommendation is that you use something which they admit increases your risk of HIV. So, for the same general public, I’ll mimic them and and summarize fact in the most general of terms:

“Use condoms with N-9, and increase your risk of contracting AIDS, rather than no condom at all, because you little pissant, we don’t give a shit about you. All we want is your money. Should you get AIDS, guess what? Our pharmaceutical division will get a hell of a lot more of your money before you die [leaving little for your pathetic excuse for a family]. A lot more than the negligible amount you spend on condoms, because you’re such a loser, you probably never get laid anyway.”

Don’t expect that bit of truth to ever pop up on MTV or the back of a condom box.

However, the above bit of honesty was actually printed on a condom box. I don’t know whether it’s from Pluto’s influence (bringing all things hidden into the light), or just a Freudean slip of grand proportions, but somehow, one condom manufacturer decided to be truthful (zoom in and read the above).

Want more “truth?” Here’s just a MINOR rundown (check for yourself) of chemicals used in the condom-making process (ultimately, what ends up INSIDE your body):

Highly Toxic: Aniline, Hexamethyline-tetramine, Ortho-toluidine
Slightly Toxic: Alpha-naphthylamine, Beta Methyline aniline, Para-Phenylinediamine

Ortho-Toluidine is possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). Para-toluidine inhalation side effects: Blue lips or finger nails. Blue skin. Confusion. Dizziness. Headache. Laboured breathing. Nausea. Shortness of breath. Unconsciousness. Weakness.
Para-toluidine ingestion side effects: Blue lips or fingernails. Blue skin. Dizziness. Headache. Laboured breathing.

Scary stuff. I should probably add, whether you choose condoms made of “real” latex, reconstituted decaying animal parts (i.e., “natural”) or synthetic latex (more toxic soup), you won’t escape the manufacturing process. You may wanna wrap yourself in a condom to protect yourself. Oh, wait. Maybe not a good idea. The last image below may best depict the consensus coping strategy:

I’m sure many, are still skeptical of my rantings, and I’m not including those who haven’t dismissed them outright (the programmed response), because they’ve very likely stopped reading by now. So, those who are still with me, yet still incredulous that such a thing could ever happen, with all the medical “professionals” and people in “charitable” organizations, who’ve devoted their lives to HIV/AIDS causes; you may be wondering how such a monumental scam could take place.

The two images above sum up the two explanations as to “how” we could have come so far. The “blind leading the blind,” or “dumb and dumber.” Which camp you fall into depends on what you do with this information. Note: I will presume that anyone who reads my blog semi-regularly isn’t shocked by these “revelations,” and shouldn’t feel this summary is addressed to them.

If you thumb your nose at this and label me a lunatic, you fall in the latter camp. If you change your entire habits based only on this article, you risk remaining in the former. If you research this on your own, and form your own opinion, well then, there’s hope for you yet, and maybe even, in the macrocosm, mankind as a whole.

*1: Actually, never really worked on Mad Ave. Though, did consult for several Fortune 500 companies, and a couple of Fortune 10. Yes, I wasted years of my life writing clever anecdotes for moral deficients. You impressed now? However, one minor claim to “jingoistic” fame: while at Uni, drunk at campus theater, shouted “Luke, you’re grounded” at one of the Star Wars showings. Was the talk of campus for all of about two weeks. Are you entertained? [LB]

*2: I moved the original “Happy 4th of July” tri-color condom pic to my upcoming blog about Barrack Hussein Obama, as (a) it suits that one a little better and (b) the EVIL image may be more “fitting” and synchs heavily with this article’s conclusions about condoms, especially considering a statement I heard David Icke make recently, about “evil” being the word “live” spelled backwards. [LB]

*3: This may be silly, but I am truly surprised I never heard a commercial where Mr. T said: “I pity the fool who doesn’t wear a condom.” [LB]

*4: I’m trying not to make this a personal diatribe, [¿too late?] but I also heard that “No glove. No love” phrase regurgitated in my direction. My response? “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater,” followed by the Woody Allenesque “I’m all out of clichés. Can we actually talk now?” [LB]

*5: One, I am speaking in context of multiple men ejaculating on someone. Looking at the Disney image, one can infer so much “sticky liquid” would require multiple donors. Two, if after reading this (and PoM’s article), you watch this Enchanted movie with an open mind (instead of one programmed to not entertain truth), dismiss the effects and then still allow your children to watch it, then you are a fucking idiot. That simple. [LB]

*6: One problem with said movie: Ben F’n Stiller! Why is he popular? Who thinks he is remotely amusing or even, tolerable? What an utterly annoying actor, and [per people I know who’ve met him] pompous excuse for a human being this person is. [LB]

*7: Breaking down each statement would require a book. If you doubt me: do your own research. A couple of links: the “joke” known as the Women’s Liberation Movement, an interesting perspective on the players/leaders of that movement (supporting video). And, at one time, I recall buying that Hugh Hefner rags to riches story, until I realized he was directly related to both John Kerry and George Bush. Oh, and Disney’s been at it for a long time. [LB]

*8: The staged sex education debate, just like the staged evolution vs. creation debate, offers no middle-ground for pragmatism and factuality. The religious “abstinence” program disregards human nature, while the Planned Parenthood approach is to push condoms (not a surprise, considering the group’s eugenics origins) and sexuality on the youngest of minds. How about an approach that teaches self-worth and self-respect? How about one that leaves it up the the parents? Yea, crazy talk! [LB]